Tangibility

In computer science random numbers are generated using data that's likely to be different each time it's ran, such as the current timestamp or values from memory. Whatever value it pulls would only ever be able to generate one specific number. The only way to apply any more randomtness to said number is to apply more calculations to it based on changing data. It can get more complex or harder to reverse engineer, but at it's core it's impossible to generate a truly random number.

By aiming a camera sensor, or other sensor, at a radioactive material, it's possible to detect stray alpha particles it emits and use their X,Y data as input for generating a random number. This is introducing a natural aspect into the equation

Half-lives are measurable lengths. Each isotope has a verified range of time that it will most likely exist for until half of it decays. This is a set unchageable value. The randomness that's seen in nature is seen as random because it reflects the same randomness that we are able to produce. If I ask you to think of a random number between one and ten your answer could depend on any number of things. Millions upon billions of things you aren't consciously even thinking about.

How much of things. How many things. Are determined. Are only executing to their stimuli? Are only outputting to their inputs? Is free will simply another response to the system which defines it as false?

Ying yang is like a fractal

I hope to do good. In my definition. In my absolution. I don't know where or why or what we are. I know that I don't know. I know I am. I'm real. If conciousness wasn't much more than chemicals, I'd hope to one day feel the combined everythingness as one, if the universe wasn't headed in the opposite direction: a flattened equidistant mass, rather than a spec of energy. Is the expansion never stopping? A logarithmic curve?

I know I won't know but I still know I am